Find a Lawyer

SYED ZAFAR ABBAS versus GLAXO WELLCOME PAKISTAN LIMITED

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) filed with the National Industrial Relations Commission against termination of employment on the basis of allegations of unfair labor practice. And investigation against them) Employees were dismissed from the job The evidence against the applicant on record shows that the charge sheet against the applicant was based on the theft charges and the applicant in his reply The stand-off charge sheet could not be clarified; the applicant was provided with an opportunity to defend, crossing the prosecution. Was provided the opportunity. For the testimony and defense of the evidence, he did not take advantage of the opportunity and the inquiry was finalized and the applicant, who was found guilty of the crime, was dismissed. The applicant / employee alleged that he was a victim of his legal trade union activities and in doing so, the employers committed unfair labor. Claimed to be a secretary, none of the trade unions failed to set up an activity that could hurt employers to the extent that they would go out of their way to become the victim of an applicant. Applicants working from one place to another, could not even base the premise that employers had committed unfair labor practices through unfair labor practice, alleging unfair labor practice. Were not enough for such an intervention best advocate from Mian Chunnu lawyer