Find a Lawyer

CRESENT WORKERS\' UNION REGISTERED versus GENERAL MANAGER, CRESENT TEXTILE MILLS LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 22A (8) (G), 22A (9) (A) and 22B (3) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (e) Termination of service The unfair labor process by the employer was terminated on the basis of employees who were members of the trade union in the establishment on the basis that they were absent from duty for more than 10 days. , Was the choice of trade union in the bone of contention. Establishment employees supported the union of their choice, while employers were interested in the rival union. Employers persuaded employees to surrender in favor of the rival union, but their fake resignations were prepared by employees for which Employees filed a criminal case against employers. Employees were discharged from duty due to absenteeism. Such actions by employers against employees showed that employees were victimized only because of their trade union activity. The vties case was justified by the National Industrial Relations Commission alleging that employees were dismissed from their services illegally simply because of their trade union activities, directing employers Was supposed to restore them to their service with 50% return benefits. property advocate from Wana lawyer