Supreme Court — Judgments of 1982

658 reported judgments of the Supreme Court from 1982 — page 2 of 7.

  • SARDARAN v. BADSHAH BEGUM 1982 SCMR 183

    The case was referred by the District Judge of the court for trial of the case of AXLI, rr 25, 26 and 27, while two objections to the nature of the case were addressed, firstly that the plaintiffs mer…

  • MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 1982 SCMR 186

    Article 212 (3) Service Inspector Reverse Post of Game Inspector (redesignated as Deputy Ranger Wildlife), 50% promotion through initial recruitment and 50% promotion of Game Ventures (in which divisi…

  • NAJABAT v. SABAN BIBI 1982 PLD 187

    Section 42 Declaration Limit H and the plaintiff and N's forefathers owning half of the N in the interest of the co-owners, in spite of owning N and owning H and I have approved the mutation. Under wh…

  • BASHIR AHMAD v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 188

    O IX, r 9 The dismissal of the application, to dismiss the petition, to exclude the applicant's offer, there is no notice of the date of the hearing on the occasion by the court which led to his dismi…

  • WAZIR MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL AZIZ 1982 SCMR 189

    Para 25 (3) Academic errors Partial pre-conversion transcript, subject to sale, transfer of the applicant's entire interest mentioned in such entries does not constitute a violation of the law. The ex…

  • HAKAN v. JAMUN 1982 SCMR 192

    Article 3 The question is whether the dispute is fundamental to the dispute between the property owners in ancestral or non-residential but such question has been omitted and likewise the other person…

  • MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. MUHAMMAD HAYAT SHAH 1982 SCMR 195

    Article 4 ((P)) allows the applicant to be acquitted of the charges at the end of the trial, but the High Court, after being satisfied, accepted the review against the order of acquittal at a full hea…

  • GHULAM NABI v. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ 1982 SCMR 196

    Section 7 497 ()) The cancellation of the bail, unpaid order, is properly presented in a timely manner, after which the events occurring cannot be made the basis for the cancellation of such order. Ab…

  • MANZOOR HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1982 SCMR 198

    Section 498 Bail The High Court does not think fit to grant bail in its discretionary jurisdiction; there was no justification for interference with such discretion, especially when the petitioner's a…

  • SECRETARY TO HEALTH GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN, QUETTA v. IMTIAZ BASHIR 1982 SCMR 199

    Article 3 Leave for appeal of the preliminary objection raised by the respondents that the candidate eligible under the High Court decision appears to be interested in enrolling the respondents' seats…

  • MUHAMMAD SHAFI v. SADIQ SAEED KHAN 1982 SCMR 199

    Article 4 (185 ()) Parties arriving on appeal request for leave to appeal after the change in appeal to the parties to the appeal and the appeal for settlement in the settlement case.…

  • MAULA BAKHSH v. FAZAL DIN 1982 PLD 201

    Section 13 (2) (vi)? Need for Reconstruction The earlier theory reaffirmed that even on this building, the foundations of the existing building could support Chobra when it was built by the landlord h…

  • LAL DINO v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 201

    Articles 168 and 181 are excluded for restitution: default and non-prosecution Article 168, limitation act, 1908, applicable, non-enforceable and non-resident article 181, therefore, thirty days in su…

  • ABDUL GHAFOOR v. MEMBER (REVENUE) BOARD OF REVENUE 1982 SCMR 202

    Section L 36 Lambdar, No one has the right to be designated as the relevant authority of the Lumbar Officer, who is a suitable person for the purpose of facilitating the management of the Lambdar for …

  • ALLAH BAKHSH v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 203

    Article 188 Reviewer is exempt from the law, which is not entitled to any relief through review.…

  • AROKEY LTD. v. MUNIR AHMAD MUGHAL 1982 PLD 204

    O XXIII, r 3 Read with Section 12 (2) the compromise of section 12 (2) which has the effect of abolishing the jurisdiction of the ordinary courts, the special remedy provided by section 12 (2) should …

  • ROSHNI v. MUHAMMAD MUNIR 1982 SCMR 204

    Article 3 (3 ()) leave to raise an objection to a new objection raised before the Supreme Court, which will result in neither a case being dismissed nor a verdict: before the Supreme Court in the cons…

  • IRSHAD AHMAD KHAN v. SHAFIQ KHAN 1982 SCMR 205

    Section 7 497 ()) Respondents for bail, cancellation charges have been accused by the High Court of overstepping their bail, not before the High Court, such charges, in the first instance. , Should ha…

  • MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. ABDUR RAUF 1982 SCMR 207

    There is no evidence to exclude Section 13, which is to show that the disputed shop landlord has an interest in or in favor of the Conflict Shop Settlement Department in another band transfer shop, ho…

  • SANATTA v. STATE 1982 SCMR 208

    Section 497 bail, the applicant's denial proved to be a definite role but no clear duty was given to the other accused on the bail. Disagreeing with the witnesses' account in the medical report could …

  • ALLAH WASAYA v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 208

    Article 300A, the exception to the murder conviction and sudden provocation, is that whenever an accused acts under wrath because of the loss of self and commits murder on the basis of justification, …

  • SIBGHAT ULLAH v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, MULTAN 1982 SCMR 210

    Article P settlement P points raised in the writ petition have been rightly excluded from the writ petition, constitution of Pakistan (3) 3) previously dealt with in the revised petition, Article ? 18…

  • NASIRA v. GHULAM HUSSAIN 1982 SCMR 211

    Article 4 (3 ()) Allow the argument that the District Judge should not have rendered a decision on eligibility while he was not eligible for a hearing, both sides heard the case, testified on all matt…

  • MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. CHAUDHRY UMAR BAKHSH 1982 PLD 212

    Section 13B withholding notice relates to the default question in section 13B rent payments and protects the tenant from such charges if this transfer is not provided by the landlord, Section 13 ( 2) …

  • MAJID v. QUTAB DIN 1982 SCMR 212

    Section 19 Delegation of Delegations Delegation of the Additional Settlement Commissioner and Settlement Commissioner Both the Chief Settlement Commissioner's delegations, once the amending powers exe…

  • MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. DIRECTOR, MLITARY LANDS 1982 PLD 213

    Article 185 (3) 50 Defense dismissal records with Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules, 1954 have nothing to do with the record, apart from the appellant's own claim, the appellant made his first reply …

  • ABDUL GHAFFAR v. DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 214

    The Schedule, Part I in the possession of the first landlord applicant in which the unit constituted which is transferred as House Petitioner, cannot demand the transfer of the property created by the…

  • MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. ALLAH DITTA 1982 SCMR 215

    Sections 5 435, 9439 and 404040 Reject Request for Review The maintenance party is fully aware of the court's machinery, personally or by the lawyer, the party, and both attorneys, the due date for it…

  • FAZAL AZIM v. TARIQ MAHMOOD 1982 PLD 218

    Section 13? Tenant Removal? Personal need? Homeowner Wanted to Be Depressed on Personal Needs? It is not expected that during the eviction proceedings the period will be virtually useless while the la…

  • PROVINCE OF SIND v. MOHANDAS 1982 PLD 220

    Modification of Section Module Module The management of the slice, outlet or module in the canal is solely with the Government unless it has the right of any kind of module unless it is governed by on…

  • MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. BOARD OF REVENUE 1982 SCMR 222

    Article 2 Appeal of the applicants' claims should also be seriously disputed in the High Court and the applicants are alleged to have produced fake documents which reveal themselves as being allotted,…

  • ABDUL QADIR v. STATE 1982 SCMR 226

    Sections 279 and 337 of the raids caused the driver to be hurt by a speedy and negligent act. Definition of evidence is responsible for the misrepresentation of the evidence or any related material on…

  • MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. STATE 1982 SCMR 227

    Sections 498 and 498A Bail Pre-arrest Bail and Bail after Arrest Due to completely different rules, rejection of arrest before arrest, arrest, arrest does not have any effect on bail [arrest].…

  • DAWOOD v. MUHAMMAD YASIN 1982 PLD 227

    Sections 13 (i) (vi) and 3 (a)? Evicted? Mutually destructive foundations personal need and rebuilding foundations? Not mutually destructive? A tenant's eviction on the same basis on the same action? …

  • ABDUL ALEEM v. MEMBER (COLONIES) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE 1982 SCMR 229

    O XLIX, r 6 Read with Civil Procedure Code (V8 of 1908), O XXIII, r 3 Settlement parties, instruct the parties to compromise freely in accordance with their wishes Authorized Authorities and Appeals R…

  • ABDUL MAJEED v. CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SIND , HYDERABAD 1982 SCMR 230

    Finding the Appeal and Review filed by the Applicants to target Article 199 Writ Petition has not been challenged before the Supreme Court even though the applicant is delayed in his treatment. A ques…

  • MUHAMMAD MOBIN SIDDIQUI v. SHAHZADI BEGUM 1982 SCMR 233

    Sections 13 and 15 evict the tenant appellant, stating that he is the respondent's tenant but the landlord admits that he was not the tenant of the claimant applicant because he ordered The petitioner…

  • LALALUDDIN v. NOORSAIN 1982 PLD 234

    Article 21 has been read with the Pakistan Rehabilitation Act (XLII of 1956), Article 11 and the Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Article 98 has been treated as writ petition as amended petition. Dema…

  • MUHAMMAD AFZAL MIR v. FAKHAR JEHAN BEGUM 1982 SCMR 235

    Article 2 ((())) allows the appellate authorities to appeal before the settlement authorities contest at all levels, such personnel decide the occupation and discrimination of the house. There is a sp…

  • MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. MUSHTAQ 1982 SCMR 237

    Arts 199 and 185 (3) were read in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898); a section 497 (2) bail was summoned but no one appeared to file the petition, so the merit was considered on…

  • MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. ABDUL HAMEED 1982 SCMR 237

    Sections 13 and 13, a forward-looking professional in entering the property as a tenant when a person is given the right to transfer that person into the property as a tenant. And if there is any doub…

  • MALA v. JAHANGIR 1982 SCMR 239

    Article 188 read with the Supreme Court Rules 1980, AXXVI r 1 The question of whether or not to be raised before a court having special jurisdiction under the review question was also considered. The …

  • KHUSHI MOHAMMAD v. MUHAMMAD DIN 1982 SCMR 241

    Article 7 (185) When there is leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, there was no careful attempt to disclose any error of law in the concurrent search of the following three courts whenever there was …

  • NAWAB BIBI v. SAIFUR REHMAN 1982 SCMR 242

    Article 4 (185 ()) is not liable for interference in leave proceedings for appeal to the Centers or factual questions for appeal [fact question]…

  • AMIR DIN v. SIDDIQUE 1982 SCMR 242

    Article 4 (185 ()) Allow the appeal on the argument that neither the lawyer nor the party whose case is being dealt with has been resolved without hearing, the period of limitation starts from the dat…

  • PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. HABIB ULLAH 1982 SCMR 243

    Section 16 and 30 awards, aside from the reasons given for award by arbitration, the decision must be applied to the evidence presented to it and to which the arbitrator did not do so, award, holding,…

  • DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, SIALKOT v. GANDA 1982 SCMR 244

    Section 10 and 11 Allotment Cancellation Department Forest (applicant) may request cancellation due to a portion of the land notified as protected forest in lieu of a certified claim made by the appli…

  • ALLAH DITTA v. FARZAND ALI 1982 SCMR 246

    Article 4 ((P)) Allow the Applicant to Appeal to the High Court, Finding No Reason for Finding Facts as to Respondents' Claimants but to Only Advise Some Additional Evidence While addressing the argum…

  • COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI v. ESTERN FEDERAL UNION INSURANCE CO. 1982 PLD 247

    Section 4) read with section 19 [As defined by the Finance Act (I of 1957)] The interpretation of the retrospectivity rules is not merely related to the procedure but is more than the procedure itself…

  • ABDULLAH JAN v. TILA MUHAMMAD 1982 SCMR 248

    Article 165 (2) read with the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) under both the unnecessary influence of the agreement, both the courts in the absence of the vendor's mentality and the i…

  • MUHAMMAD AFZAL v. MAIMUNA SHEIKH 1982 SCMR 249

    Section 13 eviction proceedings after a lengthy litigation set out for evidence on the question of alleged default in rent payments, no pre-determined proof of rent payments by tenants, nor Instead of…

  • NAZIR AHMAD v. STATE 1982 SCMR 251

    Definition of section 394 robbery evidence was not consistent with the trial court's request made in the High Court by the evidence of the police constable in the High Court. Accused evidence and poli…

  • SULEMAN v. STATE 1982 SCMR 253

    Section 307/149/148 Definition of Evidence Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) [Evidence]…

  • GULZAR ALIAS GULZARI v. STATE 1982 SCMR 254

    Section 497 (5) bail, cancellation of witnesses of two prosecutors who were killed in the accused's shop where the accused was seen and another witness watching when the accused fled from the scene of…

  • GUL SALUB DIN v. SULTAN JAN 1982 PLD 254

    0XXIII, r 1 suit, the withdrawal of the application for a retrial can only harm the rights of the applicant as he or she is involved in formal defects but has no details about the formal defects other…

  • SANAULLAH v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA 1982 PLD 256

    In section 31 (as amended by the Punjab Local Government (Amendment) Ordinance (IV of 1981)], the words of the motion of no-confidence in Sections (2) and (3) of Section 31 are followed by the second …

  • HADIAT ULLAH v. HABIB ULLAH 1982 SCMR 256

    Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) read with Civil Code of Conduct (V 1908), O XLI, r 27 Production of Extra Evidence in the Appellate Court Appeal Court has to produce additional evidence based on the evidence.…

  • MOHAMMAD SARWAR v. STATE 1982 SCMR 257

    The benefit of the Section 8 suspect8 bail cannot be granted to the accused simply because of his CC as he has been declared as the main accused in the FIR as the accused accused and he has been place…

  • M. ILYAS & SONS v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, LAHORE CONE 1982 PLD 259

    Section 10 (2) (xvi) The Director's Compensation Allowance deduction As A's father and his four sons join themselves in a private limited company, they appoint them as directors and fix their compensa…

  • SIRAJ DIN v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB 1982 SCMR 259

    The Registrar of Section 54 can decide the matter on his own rather than remand to the arbitrator, Section P 54 the applicant has no unacceptable right to the allotment of the plot allotted to any oth…

  • MESSRS T.V SERVICE STATION v. PARVEEN ANWAR AFIRIDI 1982 SCMR 260

    Section 13 (3) (a) (i) The respondent's personal respondent's father has married his mother's second and his mother and stepfather have resided in the central bungalow because of personal need. He and…

  • HABIB AHMAD v. AHMAD SAEED 1982 SCMR 262

    Section 13 (2) (iv) accuses tenants of damage to property, alleging that the tenant has erected two walls and corrugated sheets under which the rear doors of the shop and the rear doors of other shops…

  • ISHTIAQ AHMAD RAJA v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, GUJAR KHAN 1982 PLD 263

    The motion of the trustee cannot be moved after a period of six months, counting from the date of assumption of office, nor after the second or after the expiry of such six months. Action cannot be ta…

  • MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 1982 SCMR 263

    Section 13 and 14 are to be dismissed as the order of the rent controller under section 14 of Ordinance VI of 1959 and against such order in the absence of orders under such section. No appeal can be …

  • IRSHAD AHMAD v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 264

    Article 199 The Right Jurisdiction Settlement Commissioner cannot find any allotment in favor of the applicants, which is shown in the Register of Rights for the year 1964 65 and such applicants claim…

  • MUHAMMAD HALIM v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 265

    Article 4 ((())), on leave of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner's request for appeal, was not authorized to restore the appeal upon dismissal by the relevant respondents, as default deferred. This is…

  • MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KAHUTA 1982 PLD 266

    Section (2 (2), ()) of the section II's non-confidence movement relates to the second or subsequent motion of no confidence against the chairman or vice chairman and such movement shall be made for si…

  • ALLAH DITTAN v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 267

    Section 396 robbery and evidence of murder A former rivalry between testimonies and witnesses of the prosecution is suggested during the indictment or even inspection. The Agriculture Department offic…

  • GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. ABDUL MATEEN SIDDIQUI 1982 SCMR 267

    Article 98 All jurisdiction in the jurisdiction of the author is held together as a residential unit, no part of it as a freelance shop chief settlement commissioner on special request, proceeding in …

  • MUHAMMAD YAHYA v. MISBAH-UL-HAQ 1982 SCMR 269

    Article 199 Related annotations Write the jurisdiction that the findings produced by the Tribunal are not only grossly irrelevant, but are also based on speculative intervention based on the Constitut…

  • MUHAMMAD AMAN v. ATA MUHAMMAD 1982 SCMR 270

    Section 10 and 20 Allotment Cancellation Review Orders by which the relevant applicant has been approved after the relevant persons have been given the appropriate opportunity, cannot file a complaint…

  • MUSHTAQ HUSSAIN v. SASREM AKHTAR 1982 PLD 271

    The appointment of an R-19 (2) (d) lumberman, although not yet generally qualified for the post of headman, may be appointed when the sole owner of the relevant State or for special reasons in other m…

  • ZARINA RAUF BUTT v. MALIK AZIZ AHMAD 1982 PLD 272

    Settlement Scheme No. VIII, read paragraph 24 with paragraph 24, requires the auction buyer to deposit two installments of the price but the amount was not deposited in favor of which the Deputy Settl…

  • WALI MUHAMMAD v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 272

    Clause 10 and 11 have been fraudulently claimed to have been acquired by fraud on the information provided by the defendant to the allottee for the cancellation reinstatement acquired by the Allotment…

  • BHAGO v. MASITAY KHAN 1982 SCMR 275

    Section 11 Martial Law Authorities impose pre-allotment, cancellation and reinstatement laws in favor of the appellant under the Martial Law Authority but such confiscation is later canceled if respon…

  • IFTIKHAR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 277

    Article 302 was read with the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) [murder case] compromise between the parties to be compromised, even if it was without compensation, reduction of punishm…

  • MUHAMMAD FARID KHAN v. MIR ZAMAN KHAN 1982 PLD 278

    Section 13 (3) (ii) (a) ?? Evicted ??? Personal need? Does the landlord need a jewelry store? In the context of the limbadar statement, does the word pronouns clearly mean zati or u na and the express…

  • UBAIDULLAH v. SHER MOHAMMAD 1982 SCMR 279

    Section 13 in the payment of rent provides the appellant of the evicted tenant ample opportunity to present evidence in connection with the alleged payment of rent. Without point merit, the petition w…

  • MOHKAM-UD-DIN v. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 280

    Article 3 ((())) after the contest against the defendants in respect of the property in dispute, the applicant resort to the petitioner to reopen the same questions that the respondents had committed …

  • SHAUKAT ALI v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 280

    Increase the sentence read with section 932 ((?) ()) section & 32 and with 34 The High Court can certainly extend the conviction of a convicted person under section 9439 (?) but not the magistrate. Th…

  • KHALIL-UR-REHMAN v. MUHAMMAD IQBAL KHAN 1982 SCMR 281

    Shadow, Part I Evacuation Home Transfer The Home Transfer had rightly rejected a petition in the disputed house with his mother not having the information about the transfer of the house in favor of h…

  • GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. IRSHAD AHMAD 1982 PLD 282

    Arts 187 and 185 (3) and Rules of the Supreme Court (1956), AJCL IX, r 6 The Supreme Court, the powers of the unsealory and the contingent orders, the Supreme Court has the appropriate authority to st…

  • MANGTA v. LAB DIN 1982 SCMR 282

    Section 15 Pre-Disciplinary Trial The right-of-trial court did not find the defendants the owner of the property and any vendors except the applicant being the owner of the estate and the applicant as…

  • MUHAMMAD AWAIS v. MUHAMMAD ALAM 1982 SCMR 283

    Allow Article 4 (185 ()) to appeal the findings of the High Court because the defendants did not successfully verify any of the reasons which it has and its roots are legally superior to the High Cour…

  • MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. NASEER AHMAD 1982 SCMR 284

    The issue of section 100 Second Appeal in the dispute, whether the relevant mutation is genuine or hypothetical, is clearly settled by a trial court on this issue and has been confirmed by the Distric…

  • MUHAMMAD SAEED v. SHAUKAT ALI 1982 SCMR 285

    Section 5 Delay Delays The rest of the requests are banned until full time may be allowed for obtaining copies, but delays in filing the application every day are not satisfactory.…

  • AKBAR ALI SHAH v. MUHAMMAD SHAH 1982 SCMR 286

    Section 100 Second appeal shall not be re-interfered with in secondary appeal in the finding of fact recorded by the District Judge, second appeal is not possible, [evidence]…

  • COLLECTOR, SHEIKHUPURA v. ZUBAIDA 1982 SCMR 287

    Article 8 (185) Petition by the Applicants to Release the Charges of the Appeals as They Have Not Objected to any Objection by the Applicant, which in their absence It is believed that he has the requ…

  • MUSTAFA v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 1982 SCMR 288

    Section 4 ((())) allows the High Court to appeal a very detailed and comprehensive decision for reasons not to believe the prosecution's evidence. The case for removal of evidence is appropriate for t…

  • KHAIR DIN v. THE STATE 1982 PLD 291

    Section 161 reads with the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), except for section 5 (2), all witnesses supporting the complainant are exempt from their first statements, the police and Refusing…

  • SAID RAHMAN v. STATE 1982 SCMR 291

    Good responsibility read with Section 302, Section 303, Exception IV and Section 304, Part I [Murder Case] Suddenly the investigating officer on the telephone arrives at the scene, arriving in a publi…

  • MAIRAF BEGUM v. EJAZ ANWAR 1982 PLD 294

    Articles 302, 300, exceptions 1 and 304 (1) were read with the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), appeal against re-arrest in favor of the disposal of Article 185 (3 [murder case]) evidence possibly lea…

  • CHIRAGH DIN v. SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER 1982 SCMR 296

    Shadow, Part I Evacuation Evidence There was no documentary evidence to support the claim of premature occupation of the premises, even as the latest document presented by the applicant for the first …

  • MEHAR DIN v. AMIR DIN 1982 SCMR 298

    Hiccup's first evacuation home relocation has been moved to the appellant and the disputed premises, which have two separate numbers with separate assessments, before the partition appellant applied f…

  • NUSRAT ULLAH v. ATHAR JAMIL 1982 SCMR 300

    After the transfer of both cases to the facts and circumstances of the case, Section 24 is satisfied with the report of the trial judge that no trial can be made for the transfer of the trial before t…

  • MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ 1982 SCMR 301

    Sections 497 and 498 bail in the first information report because of the murder by the accused respondents because of the allegations leveled by the first information report that the High Court had gi…

  • RAZIA BEGUM v. JAHANGIR 1982 PLD 302

    Article 3 Pen3 was read with partial code (XLV of 1860), section 302 and constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) reduced to appeal (criminal), the trial court sentenced the accused to death b…

  • PAKISTAN GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 1982 SCMR 302

    Article 186 (3) Appeal Leave Returned on a false statement Appeal of delayed deferment and order of withdrawal of concession leave…

  • ZAHIDA YOUSAF v. IFTIKHAR AKHTAR 1982 SCMR 303

    A. XLI, r 23 Remand (civil) petitioners file an appeal before the District Judge and the appeal has been accepted due to the cross examination of the applicant / tenant even though their statement has…

  • LIAQAT SHAH v. STATE 1982 SCMR 305

    Article 2 ((())) allows the petitioner's appeal to be made, stating that the High Court's observation improves the story of a woman by including her name as an accused. Has been made and therefore can…

Other years — Supreme Court

2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.