Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus NASEER AHMAD


The issue of section 100 Second Appeal in the dispute, whether the relevant mutation is genuine or hypothetical, is clearly settled by a trial court on this issue and has been confirmed by the District Judge to be final, holding the High Court, On appeal, the second appeal was rightly dismissed. By the facts of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)
1982 S C M R 284

Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain and Nasim Hasan Shah, JJ

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners

Versus

NASEER AHMAD‑Respondent

Civil Petition No. 448 of 1977, decided on 29th November, 1980.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 31‑3‑77 of the Lahore High Court in R. S. A. No. 382 of 1977).

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑

--S. 100‑Second appeal‑Matter in dispute, whether relevant muta tion genuine or fictitious, clearly one of fact‑Findings recorded on issue by trial Court and confirmed by District Judge being final, High Court, held, rightly dismissed second appeal on ground of matter having been concluded by a finding of fact‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)

Ch. Bashir Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court instructed by Sh. Abdul Karim, Advocate‑on‑Record (absent) for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 29th November, 1980.

ORDER

NASIM HASAN SHAH, J.

‑This petition is directed against the judgment dated 31‑5‑1977 in R. S. A. No. 382 of 1977. The High Court dismissed the second appeal of the petitioners on the ground that the matter was "concluded by a finding of fact".

It is not disputed that the question in dispute was whether mutation of sale relied upon by the petitioners was genuine or fictitious. The learned trial Court held that this was a forged and fictitious‑document after discussing the evidence at length. The finding was upheld by the learned District Judge, Vehari. After adverting to the relevant evidence, the matter in dispute was clearly one of fact and the finding recorded thereon by the trial Court and confirmed by the District Judge, was final. The High Court, has, therefore, rightly dismissed the second appeal on the ground the matter was concluded by a finding of fact. Such a finding cannot be interfered with in the present proceedings.

This petition, therefore, fails and is dismissed hereby.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Sambrial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.