Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MUSHTAQ


Arts 199 and 185 (3) were read in accordance with the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898); a section 497 (2) bail was summoned but no one appeared to file the petition, so the merit was considered on the matter. Because this is another matter. After the Inquiry FIR was valid, the High Court was found to have granted bail application, disapproval order, and justification for leave of appeal, as the criminal code without merit arts 199 and 185 (3) The Code of Conduct (V9 1898), read with section 497 (2), was sought for a bail, but no one appeared to file a petition, so the matter being considered in the High Court's final eligibility After approval, the justification for the High Court, the request for bail, the invalid order, and the application for leave, were dismissed without merit.

1982 S C M R 237(1)

Present : Aslam Riaz Hussain and Shafi‑ur‑Rahman, JJ

MUHAMMAD HUSAIN‑Petitioner

Versus

MUSHTAQ AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 224 of 1980, decided on 28th May, 1980.

(On appeal against the judgment and order dated 16‑4‑1980 of the Lahore High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1092‑B of 1980).

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑

Arts. 199 & 185(3) read with Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 497(2)‑Bail‑Case called out but none appearing to press petition, hence case considered on merits‑Conclusion of High Court as to case being one of further inquiry found justified after perusal of F. I. R., bail application before High Court, impugned order, and petition for leave to appeal‑Petition dismissed as without merit.

M. Akhtar Raja, Advocate Supreme Court (absent) and M. Aslam Choudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents

Date of hearing: 28th May, 1980.

ORDER

ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN,

J.‑This petition by Muhammad Husain is directed against the order of the High Court dated 16‑4‑1980 whereby bail was granted to Mushtaq, respondent. The case has been called out. It is 12‑05 p.m. but no one is presents to press the petition. We, therefore, proceed to consider the same on merits. Having gone through the F. I. R., bail application before the High Court; the impugned order and the present petition, we feel that the conclusion of the High Court that the case in question is one of further enquiry envisaged by section 497 (2), Cr. P. C. is justified. The petition is, therefore dismissed as being without merit.

Petition dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best advocate from Patoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.