Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

STATE versus GOHAR REHMAN


Arts 170, 4 and 5 and Rules (in succession) Order (I 1958), Article 2 (7) violate the fundamental right of the applicants to proceed with the cancellation of the constitution pending a pre-requisite writ. (1956)

1969 S C M R 460

Present: Muhammad Munir, C. J., M. Shahabuddin, A. R. Cornelius, Amiruddin Ahmad and S. A. Rahman, JJ

THE STATE‑Appellant

versus

GOHAR REHMAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Criminal Appeals Nos. 68 and 69 of 1958, decided on 1st December 1959.

(On appeal from the order of the High Court of West Pakistan, Peshawar Bench, Peshawar, dated the 11th November 1957, in Miscellaneous Application No. 93 of 1954).

Constitution of Pakistan (1956)----

---

Arts. 170, 4 & 5 and Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958), Art. 2 (7)‑Pending proceedings on writs preferred on ground of violation of Fundamental Right of petitioners‑Abated on abrogation of Constitution (1956).

State v. Dosso P L D 1958 S C (Pak.) 533 and The Province of East Pakistan v. Muhammad Mehdi Ali Khan and others P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 387 ref.

Jamul Hussain Rizvi, Advocate‑General of West Pakistan Iftikhar‑ul‑Huq Khan, Advocate Supreme Court with him) instructed by Ijaz Ali, Attorney for the State.

Nemo for Respondents.

Date of hearing : 1st December 1959.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD MUNIR, C. J.‑

This order applies to Criminal ,Appeals Nos. 68 and 69 of 1958.

Certain criminal proceedings taken under the Frontier Crimes Regulation against Gobar Rehman and Muhammad Shafi respondents to Appeal No. 68, and Dilaram, Torai, Maluk and H. Humah respondents to Appeal No. 69, were, on an application for a writ, quashed by the High Court of West Pakistan on ground that the provisions of the Regulation under which action "had been taken were void because of Article 5 of the Constitution. The Constitution was abrogated on 7th October 1958, and the present position is governed by the Laws (Continuance in Force) Order, 1958. This Court has held in the State v. Dosso (P L D 1958 S C (Pak.) 533) and The Province of East Pakistan v. Muhammad Mehdi Ali Khan and others (P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 387), that applications for writs preferred on the ground that fundamental right of the applicant has been violated abate under Article 2, clause 7 of the Laws (Continuance in Force) Order, if on the issuance of a writ the High Court has certified the case to be a fit one for appeal or if special leave to appeal from the judgment of the High Court has been given by this Court. These decisions govern both the appeals and the only order that can now be made is that the applications on the strength of which the writs were issued by the High Court have abated. We allow the Government Appeals and set aside the writs issued.

Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Upper Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.