SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WAPDA versus NAZAKAT HUSSAIN SHAH
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Worker's Payment Worker Suspended and Restored Labor Court ordered the employer to pay its legal obligations, but the employer is of the view that the Labor Court's controversial order was a speech. Was not ordered and therefore he was not in that position. In the same order, facts of the case were neither given nor details of the worker's claim. The worker was unable to say anything in support of the unidentified Labor Court order, unable to maintain the order, the order was set aside and the case was recently remanded. The decision after giving the parties the opportunity to present evidence
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Adda Shaiwala lawyer
