Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii), 25 A&38 (3), jurisdiction of bank employees for failure to read momentarily evidence of labor court inquiry against dismissal of allegations of corruption The application was dismissed, due to an error in the decision's return that the alleged employees were charged against the bank employee for refusing to leave the job as employees, as described in Section 2 (xxviii) and in such cases, The Labor Court could not request the jurisdiction of the Labor Court Order. The appellate tribunal directed the applicant's applicant to return the complaint to the appropriate forum, subject to the condition that, in the case of a decision before the Supreme Court, labor courts have jurisdiction. So, the complaint petition will be accepted and the appellant will be reinstated without issue. Benefits
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
