DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint against termination of service Railway employee (Mason) was initially appointed as substitute for his father, who went on medical leave. He continued to work for more than a year after that. His father's services were terminated on the failure of his employees to succeed in the commercial examination, and as the job was based on daily wages, the Labor Court found that such vacancy had become permanent after his father's retirement and The applicant is entitled to be considered under the employee absorption. Retained commercial test if required by Appellate Tribunal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
