SHAMSI BUILDERS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI versus SHAMSI BUIFLDERS WORKERS\' UNION
Articles 26, 34 and 36 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 were placed on the industrial duty duty employer to try to resolve the dispute through mutual negotiation, but did not require employees to attend a meeting notice by the employer. The question is whether the respondent's union participated in the negotiation proceedings or not in response to the employer's notice was a question of fact which can be decided only after the evidence has been registered. Employee absenteeism indicates that there was no settlement by employers in an attempt to negotiate and resolve bilateral disputes. Whether legally I can proceed with the settlement and the date of the notice when the Labor Court had to decide the effect of the reconciliation in such proceedings after the evidence was presented to the Labor Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
