Find a Lawyer

GENERAL MANAGER, ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL, UTILITY STORES CORPORATION LTD. versus NAZAR MUHAMMAD BHUTTO

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Careful Risk of Salaries Payments Employee of the Responsible Worker Appellant. An accused was allegedly robbed of money he was going to deposit in the bank, the worker filed a case with the police for filing the first information but the police filed the first information against the respondents, which was later removed from the job. Granted while a criminal case against him is still pending. Keep up the work but his salary was stopped due to shortage which was allegedly due to him being ordered by the Labor Court to pay restitution and recoupment money when the pay amount was withheld or deducted. If no inquiry was made by the inquiry officer or any court, the respondent did not get a chance to hear the case, which was against the established principles of natural justice and fair play, because the respondent was not abused or lacking. The employer was obliged by the respondents to work for him till now and could not resolve the deficiency till the final decision reached the case. Oops, was found guilty in the inquiry was dropped huge order of Labor Court online advocate from Gharo lawyer