IMAMUDDIN versus MODERN TEXTILE MILLS LTD., TANDO JAM
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections O15 (2) and 15 (3) of Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A dismissing the appellant from employment on the employee's absence. More than ten days after he was dismissed, the appellant stated that his gate was stopped, but before the inquiry officer, the appellant's testimony testified that the Labor Court, along with the inquiry officer, did not show that the appellant. More absent. Applicant's allegation that he was a gate for more than ten days without permission does not prove from any authentic evidence that he was not appealed to the employer by the appellant on any particular hindrance prevented. A prejudice has been brought against the inquiry officer alleging that the inquiry officer committed an illegal action. Or the appellant in a prejudicial manner did not examine the witnesses who had previously been acquitted against him. The Labor Court quashed the Labor Court's order not to deny the appellant and to appeal the appellant's intervention complaint. The Officer Labor Court provided concrete reasons and valid grounds.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
