MODERN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. TANDO JAM versus MUHAMMAD SAMIULLAH
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Termination of Services Due to restructuring of workers and contract work, respondent was employed by Appellant Textile Mills as an employee but due to the granting of his complaint to the department Its services have been terminated. The respondent was allowed and was restored to employment by the Labor Court. The relationship between the employer and the employee was not good. Each party was held responsible for each other's mistakes under which the agreement between the parties was settled. Was found under which all the workers whose losses were useless did not mention the contractor-based worker anywhere. Given that the entire department was on a contractual basis, in view of the evidence presented in connection with the contract, it cannot be said that the reorganization, if any, was for a broader purpose and to relieve workers, including the respondents. What was not worked for was allegedly causing trouble to the administration.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
