Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED NIZAMANI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH S&GAD THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

The Section 9 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), the Section 4 Promotion Appeal Service Tribunal Care, had apprehended the notification issued by the Chief Secretary under which the respondents were promoted, but the Appellant. Was not given enough development to meet the provincial selection meeting. The Board may again be summoned to determine the promotion issues, which include the appellate jurisdiction of section 9 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act 1973, provided that in the case of a selection post, the development is based on a selection on merit. Will go In case of non-selection on the basis of low fitness posts, which will consist of B19 and 20 election posts, it is stated that development of posts will be made on selection basis on merit, not Appellant due to lack of qualification. Was. The B20 was found fit for development and he was resigned because the appellant admitted that not one of the defendants was eligible for consideration for promotion until B20 when he was facing an inquiry into the NAB case, It was dismissed, as the NAB case merely faced scrutiny, in no way would the respondents be considered for promotion to the highest position. Even otherwise, according to the department, the investigation into the NAB case against the defendants had already ended; the appeal was not sustained, due to its merits. us immigration advocates from Khurian wala lawyer