Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID RAJPUT versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI

The Section 8 and 9 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Seniority and Publicity Appeal Service Tribunal Sanitary List revealed that the appellants were placed in serial number 15, while the respondents had serial numbers 19 and 20 below them respectively. I was kept While the Promotion Committee meeting, appellant, as respondents' senior, deserved to be considered for publicity, the reasons for not discussing the Annual Secret Report for the relevant year were excluded from consideration; As a result, his juniors were promoted to Grade 16. Although the respondents were senior, the appellant was not so publicized. If the applicant's annual confidential information was not presented to the Public Promotion Committee at the relevant time, the appellant could not have been convicted or the appellant had been mistaken. Could not target. If the matter is forwarded to the department authority for consideration, then according to the Law Council of the authorities, their case was accepted by the appellant's prayer, the petitioner's prayer was accepted and the case remand was obtained. Yes, the Department Authority has been instructed to consider the Appellant's case in accordance with law \ r \ n famous lower court advocate from Timergara lawyer