Find a Lawyer

KAZI JAN MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI

R12 (a) (b) of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Sovereignty, an appeal was filed against the appellant's cancellation of the first notification under which the appellant was posted as Assistant Commissioner Appellant. But seniority was allowed, in which they were selected. The Information Group, which joined the Civil Service Academy in 1984, placed Appellant's services on deputation in 1994 under the authority of the Government of Sindh, and was subsequently transferred to the post of Assistant Commissioner by transfer and 20 10 1996. After appellant he was assigned seniority in the cadre mentioned above. His request was granted seniority from 1981 to 1984, when he joined the federal government under a notification under R12 (A) of the Government Employees (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules 1975, shortly thereafter, Regarding the representation of the affected persons on receipt in large numbers, it was said that the notification was canceled / withdrawn, unnecessary notification records indicate that the government was at its request to include the applicant in Sindh. The appellant's case will, under the circumstances, come under R12 (b) of the Sindh Civil Servants (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, and his seniority will be counted from the date of his permanent involvement in the Sindh government. And the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of R 12 (a) of the appellant's rules that he was not given an opportunity to be heard, the principles of natural justice were violated, it was overturned. The first time he was appointed to the Sindh government in 1996 / none of the other officers was given a personal hearing. Second, the whole of the appellant pakistani advocates Darya Khan lawyer