Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI SAQI versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH

RR 4 (1) (a) (ii) (iii), 5 and 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Prevention of two-year increments and promotion of the appellant for a period of two years on this charge. Stop. The inquiry report disclosed that the appellant sought to obtain the verification of the documents, or any illegal act, which was suspected of being involved in the illegal registration of illegal duty paid vehicles imported under the Diplomatic Corps without verification. Was not involved in any kind of irregularities. The Motor Registration Wing and Appellant Appellant could not, in most cases, ask the EETO about the Foreign Office's NOC, but for this simple error by the Appellant, two penalties, namely, promotions. It was very hard to withhold and stop the encroachment, otherwise two sentences of different and different kinds, though it may be trivial, were not justified under these principles. The censor's minor sentence, in the circumstances, was sufficient to meet the end of justice. The two penalties, on, were converted to censure ure \ r \ n fines how to become a advocate from Dhirkot lawyer