Find a Lawyer

NISAR AHMED versus CAPITAL CITY POLICE OFFICER, KARACHI

Served as a Junior Clerk, serving as Section 5 and 9 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Appointment and Promotion Reverse Appeal Appellant, and served as his Division I Police (B9). The duties began as such, but suddenly with the orders of the Chief Minister, along with others, the Junior Clerk returned to his original position of Appellant and again and again with no legal action as an Appellant. It has been confirmed. The appointment of appellant as Junior Clerk as A Section I Police was not only changed in the cadre but on the recommendation of the three members, he was restored to the rank of A Section I Police, with the approval of the Chief Minister. Under the Chief Minister's position, the Junior Clerk could not approve the appellant's replacement orders, without the appellant's restitution being a crime, it is not possible that the corrupt authority exercised its own powers, In the absence of the appellant there were no laws under the law approving the sanction order The appellant had no value. Appellant had already acquired a lawful, valuable and deserving right in his favor; the rule of Lux poenitentiae, that is, the ability to abolish power until decisive action was not available to the authority, was not sustainable. The disputed order of the adjournment was set aside, with the appellant being reversed with the subbank, having been appointed to the post of sub-inspector. And the benefits of the result pakistani advocates Jhand lawyer