Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI

RR 4 (1) (b) (iv), 5 and 6 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 exempts the Appellant from service without issuing a notice and holding an inquiry against him. Dismissed. 30 days lant on vacation absent from duty was allowed. After this earned leave expires, the appellant twice applied for an extension of leave on the medical ground producing medical certificate issued by the Registrar, the absence of the appellant after the Orthopedic Postgraduate Medical Center was formalized. , But nonetheless the huge fine for service dismissal was applied, according to the legality of the applicants, under litigation, the accused public servants could not be fined twice for the same mistake and commission as unauthorized. B. Absence of absenteeism with extraordinary leave without pay The fact that the charge of dismissal of employment on the same service was neither appropriate nor justified when the absentee was considered to be on full pay or without pay, then the accused public servant could not be declared absent. And if in any case the civil servant was treated absent, he could not be dismissed on the basis of that, then he could not be treated on leave and if he was treated on leave. So he could not behave absent, the absence of the appellant was treated like a leave without pay and regular. Was, on this score, to order a major dismissal of employment, reversed in the eyes of the law and inappropriate for restoring the appellant in service treatment. divorce advocates from Chakwal lawyer