Find a Lawyer

KIRSHAN LAL OAD versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, SINDH

RR 4 (1) (b) (iii), 5 and 6 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), action was taken against the appellant against the removal and loss of employment from section 4 and service and After issuing show cause notices to the appellants for non-restitution and after investigating allegations against them, the alleged damages were disclosed that they made illegal appointments on illegal appointments. The appellants were neither the appointing authorities nor did they accuse anyone during the appointment which was established during the inquiry. The action was that they prepared and cared for their immediate and superior proprietors' book and outward entry in connection with the appointments made by their superiors and appellants, in order to avoid their own superiority. Follow the orders of the officers. The disciplinary proceedings were not on record to indicate that the appellants had received any financial benefit from the appointments made by their senior officers appellant, in which case, at the end of the inquiry report, some inquiry officers were entitled, It was also stated that the circumstances under which the appellants have to go through and they are compelled to do so. A conviction for a reduction in rank may be considered, which would be appropriate and would serve the purpose of achieving justice, while retaining illegal orders, removing the appellant from the job for a term of up to five years. Changed the rating to lower for family advocate from Daharki lawyer