KAMRAN AHMAD versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Article 199 The Impact of Adoption of Legal Services by a Government-Owned Company to Maintain a Constitutional Petition of a Government-Owned and Controlled Company Employee Frustrated Not to Appoint a Petitioner / Government-Owned Company Employer to His Highness It was held that the applicant / employee was of the view that the terms and conditions of his letter of appointment were governed by the laws of WAPDA, so the High Court had the power to intervene in the terms and conditions of the contract appointment. Under the rules, the Hydration Petitioner was adhered to the employee and the WAPDA rules were given to the employees. Neither by any law but by the adoption or application of the laws of the Government in the terms of the contract appointment letter, the legal code or material shall not be automatically lend to such laws. The terms and conditions of the applicant employee. Under the circumstances, the contract was a legal entity not authorized by the laws of the state, so violating such rules would violate the contract and the enforcement would not be a law nor would the employees The petition was not governed by the employee providing legal protection of sorts. By constitutional petition such rules and conditions of their contract of service were not enforceable The constitutional application was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
