MUHAMMAD BILAL SALEEM versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR DISTRICT HOUSING
Article 199 Allotment policy of the Provincial (Punjab) Government was the son of the deceased government employee, the allotment of plots to the helpless families, family of the deceased government employee, and his mother (widow) with allotment rights. The vote was a successful draw. The applicant defied the provincial government's decision, stating that only one of the deceased's family could be allotted the plot, which was his mother's (widow's) petitioner's opinion that he The deceased was an orphan of the public servant, the allotment was also eligible for the family of the deceased government employee was properly replaced with plot allotment in favor of his widow and from the same fact the son of the deceased government employee was the applicant. This forced the second allotment of plot for the widows and orphans of government employees in the Quota Dataset quota. There is a certain percentage of bricks, and if a single family was not allowed to apply to the same allotment, then the quota could be eliminated by multiple allotments to some families. The scheme was not meant to provide windfall benefits to any helpless family members, but rather to provide them with a home security in their home. The constitutional request was rejected, in the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014