Find a Lawyer

SYED KHADIM HUSSAIN versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO.III, LAHORE

Section 19 (3) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Petition The applicant's complaint was that the defendant / applicant of the sale of the mortgaged property through a public auction executing the decree passed by the banking court, the reserve price of the property. The auction is intended. There was a very low price and, depending on the accrual report, the executive court erroneously determined it and the reserve price of the property should have been fixed at the market rate. Accuracy The reserve price was always temporary in nature and was the lowest price from which the bid began. The lower reserve price attracted more bidders to participate in the fair competition because the decision maker was unlikely to be biased because he would be interested in the final bid, namely the bidder's offer, at which price The property will be worth it. The constitutional application for sale was dismissed accordingly

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• MUHAMMAD BILAL SALEEM v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR DISTRICT HOUSING 2014 PLD 328
• PAKISTAN PEOPLES PARTY v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 2014 PLD 330
• IFTIKHAR AHMED HAMMAD v. PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE 2014 PLC 331
• KAMRAN AHMAD v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2014 PLC(CS) 332
• YASIR IMRAN alias YASIR ARAFAT v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 2014 MLD 337
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, CHAKWAL 2014 PCrLJ 343
• MUHAMMAD AHMAD JAVED v. State 2014 PCrLJ 352
• MUHAMMAD NADEEM NASIR v. CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE 2014 MLD 353

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

solicitors from Lala rukh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes