YASIR IMRAN ALIAS YASIR ARAFAT versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF
Sections 302, 367A, 377, 201 and 34 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), supplemental statement for abduction of unnatural lust, committing fornication, missing evidence of crime or inaccurate information to screen offender. The complainant introduced the accused in the FIR and said that the complainant's supplementary statement could not be displayed while recording the complainant's statements as the section 162 CCPC was banned. The statement was not listed in a dubious format, but was the same petition that was signed by the complainant in which the structure of the application was identical except for the names of the accused and the prosecution witnesses, which resulted in the statements. The basis for arriving at was that the complainant's nephew was last seen in the company's company. The accused force local police to take legal action against them and not only that the matter was found then challan was brought before the court of competent jurisdiction for trial in accordance with the law. Thereafter there was no legal restriction on the appearance of the applicants / additional statement. The High Court had refused to interfere with the trial court's order and retained the same amendment. Dismiss in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
