Section 302 (b) / 34 Qatl e amd, Definition of Common Purpose Evidence The benefit of the doubt is the testimony of the complainant and the prosecutor, even though they were both related to the deceased and mere loss of their evidence alone is not sufficient. Were. Or if such witnesses fail to prove that they have witnessed the incident and are present on the spot, then their statements may be rejected. And it was not obliged the court to rely on the statements of unwanted witnesses, otherwise, if they were not found to be credible, no vacant 30 bore pistol had been deposited by the investigating officer at the location. The suspects were present and where they were from. Both of the victims were shot, while empty backs have been recovered from inside the courtyard that led to the suspect's case overnight, but witnesses did not disclose the source of the light in which they were seen. In the absence of any source of incident light, it was not possible for the eyewitnesses to look at the accused persons, as there was a contradiction between the complainant's statement and medical evidence, which led to the injuries on the person's death. Was told about the place. Impeachment of statements made during court appearances to fill millions; it was not safe, relying on his statements to maintain punishment and punishment under the circumstances; The recovery of the case was not helpful in the prosecution's case, as the accused remained on physical remand for thirteen days, but still during physical remand.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
