Section 2 302 (b) Qatil appreciated the evidence, dropped the charges, was specifically named in the immediately-filed FIR, and the names of the witnesses were also provided; Weapons were recovered. Which was sent to a forensic science laboratory that resembles crime. The laboratory report revealed that the same weapon found on the suspects' information was fired, although both witnesses were related to the victim, but only the witnesses were related. It is not enough to deny the testimony of such witnesses, unless it is shown that their evidence was not trustworthy in order to falsely implicate this trust in the affirmative account by the said witnesses. Had failed to identify any ulterior motive for making false allegations. , The investigation could not be dispersed by the defense, the statements of the witnesses were properly relied upon by the trial court, in which case the prosecutor failed to prove the contention that the victim was injured. Was. The evidence of the prosecution's witnesses was not fatal to the important statements. Defendant H could not prove Alibi's request that the plaintiff's plain statement that it was an unlawful event, without any immediate, credible and credible evidence. The prosecution did not believe it proved that the incident was in the presence of witnesses and was prosecuted by a trusting ocular account. , Which was based on the medical evidence and the facts of the recovery of the weapon of the crime from the example of the accused,
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
