Section 8 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), the suit for recovery of section 573 property, the doctrine of suit for recovery of possession on the basis of an agreement to sell the date 10, 1971, was decided by the trial court. But the lower appellate court dismissed the case in favor of the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiff offering a sale deed on his life-time in 1971 1971, which was a case of specific performance of the contract, which was excluded at the indication of limitation and The appeal was also dismissed, which is accused of selling 10 7 of the date. 1971 was disqualified from specific performance and lost all its usefulness in the eyes of the law, even if no one else in the contract of sale had any other rights in favor of the seller except that specific performance. Claims to protect defendants from acquittal were not justified. The alleged illegal possession was taken by him on the subject property, and he was also under contract that did not specifically mention the confiscation of the possession, and the contract for sale was not exclusively made by the civil courts. And the plaintiff's case was dismissed in the interest of the plaintiffs, the High Court reversing the judgment and order of the lower appellate court, allowing the trial to be amended.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
