Find a Lawyer

RANA MEHTAB versus F.O.P.

Article 199 Constitutional application Appointment of service in the public office in the exercise of public authority must be covered by the provincial government's request for movin 'by the provincial government, who were voluntarily appointed workers. And the applicant's admission without compensatory recognition was that there was no law covering the appointment of such workers, since Movin left office after the terms of the elected provincial assembly expired and there was no It didn't matter. The High Court is not required to issue a complaint available on record against any inspection, however, it has been observed that in the past such appointments which were excluded from the jurisdiction of the law, were dismissed by the courts. Be aware that appointments to public positions under the exercise of public authority must cover the enactment of the law as the constitutional request was dealt with accordingly. \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY v. ABID MUGHAL 2014 CLC 520
• ZAMURRAD HUSSAIN v. MUHAMMAD YOUNAS 2014 MLD 522
• WASIM RADIO TRADERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division Islamabad 2014 PTD 525
• JAVED IQBAL v. State 2014 YLR 529
• Sardar AYAZ SADIQ v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 531
• LAEEQ AHMED KHAN v. Mst. FOUZIA ASIF 2014 MLD 532
• SARFRAZ v. MUHAMMAD AKRAM 2014 MLD 536
• LIAQAT ALI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 538

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

best law firm from Jhang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes