Find a Lawyer

ZAMURRAD HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD YOUNAS

Section 148 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition for non-submission of stamp duty within a stipulated time by the Court of Appeal petition Applicants were of the view that the suit was discharged after the prescribed period for filing stamp duty. Granted, the appellate court passed a directive for verification to stamp duty but no time-bound verdict and the trial court's decision was merged with the appellate court's decision and decree, but the stipulated time for submission of stamp duty. Was not present due to division and was proceeding. The purpose of this was to separate the parties separately so that the parties could not engage in appropriate litigation where the conditions imposed by the trial court were already merged in the judgment and the appellate court extended the court's order / There was an inherent scope for expansion. The time for stamp duty submission is excluded from the constitutional request limit

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014

• ATIF FARID v. State 2014 YLR 514
• Dr. NIAZ AHMAD v. D.C.O. 2014 PLD 516
• ZAFAR IQBAL alias PAPPI v. State 2014 PCrLJ 520
• NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY v. ABID MUGHAL 2014 CLC 520
• WASIM RADIO TRADERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division Islamabad 2014 PTD 525
• JAVED IQBAL v. State 2014 YLR 529
• Rana MEHTAB v. F.O.P. 2014 PLC(CS) 529
• Sardar AYAZ SADIQ v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2014 PLD 531

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2014 →

advocate for immigration from Lala rukh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes