SARDAR AYAZ SADIQ versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Article 45, 44 & National 45 of the National Judicial Policy, ???, Constitution of Pakistan, Arts ??8 ()) and 199 Constitution Constitution Petition to be involved in holding judicial elections Constitution or Law Returning Officer, Mandate of Public Inspection Election records not considered in the Election Record The Election Commission requested the Runner-Up for the National Assembly seat to return to the constituency's Returning Officer to conduct a public inspection of the electoral record so that the Public Representation Act, 1976, of the Department of Legal Returning Officers. Examine the election record under 44. Election Additional Sessions was the Presiding Officer in the Judge's Court, the District Judiciary's participation in the holding of the General Elections, 2013 in the province was an extraordinary move which was raised in the public interest at the request of the Chief Election Commissioner. Was considered in the constitution and the law. In pursuance of the one-time exception to the national judicial policy, 2009, under the notification of the Public Representation Act, Section 7 of 1976, on 26-12 2013, the successors in the office of the Returning Officers are elected after all Instructed to perform activities. Under the law, the High Court observed whether the Election Commission considered the Judicial Officer to perform the public inspection of election records under section 44 of the Public Representation Act 1976, as it implies a runner-up candidate. ? The defamation order, such a doctrine, should be consistent with the Election Commission's position before the court, for comment to be shared with the first court and, if so, ance on the other hand, if represented by Act7 Inspection under
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
