OPTIMUS LTD. EMPLOYEES\' UNION versus OPTIMUS LIMITED
Section 25 (8) (g) National Industrial Relations Commission (Procedures and Functions) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) (c) Applicants' request for unfair wages on behalf of employers has claimed that the Employers Union Created an industrial dispute through a claim of hegemony, but the employer had adopted tactics to halt, halt, and halt trade union activities, claiming that the second union (illegally formed) demanded charters. Was also presented on which the petitioners alleged that the employers had illegally formed the trade union and their trade. Demanding delays in connection with the Charter of Demand presented by Winnin, it was further alleged that the employers had issued warning letters to the applicants on false and merely allegations that the employer had applied for unfair labor by the applicants. Were synonymous. Claiming that a request to prevent employers from committing unfair labor practices, an interim injunction was approved in which employers were prevented from taking any adverse action in connection with the employment of applicants. There was no doubt that he was a union official, but he should not be mistreated under trade union activities. Using administrative vehicles or management vehicles without permission. One of the applicants forcibly entered the office of the Admin Officer when he was busy and screamed at him and abused him and a warning letter was presented to the applicant on this account, in which the establishment could easily Needed to run
Related judgments — National Industrial Relations Commission, 2009