SADEED-UR-REHMAN versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Article 52 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 225 Constitutional plea alleging that the use of corrupt and illegal means in the election was alleged that in order to achieve success in the election, the defendant had used corrupt practices and illegal sources. Was used. That they were able to cast fake votes in their favor. The fact that the election materials, including the actual statements of the counting of different polling stations, clearly indicated that the elections were not honest, fair and in accordance with the law. And that the petitioners submitted applications for recalculation, but their applications were dismissed illegally. None of the points raised by the petitioners and the allegations leveled against the respondents can be appreciated in the constitutional petition and the High Court has commented on the exercise of its powers. Under Article 199 of the Constitution, since the disputed questions of fact in the petitions required a detailed inquiry and the recording of the evidence in its constitutional jurisdiction, and the High Court required such complex controversial questions such as extensive inquiry. Can't solve. The elections under the provisions of the Public Representation Act 1976 and they mainly raised the question of the authenticity of the elections on the basis that the respondents used corrupt practices and illegal means to win the election of Chapter VII of the Public Representation Act 1976 Was used. That when there was a dispute about holding or validating elections and there were allegations of corruption or illegality, it was just an election strip
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
