Section 6, 13, 24 and 28 for pre-detention amount 1/3 Third Deposit Suite Land Market Value Determination Rs. 80,000 as consideration for sale to the accused / vendors in unregistered registered sale deed. , Which the plaintiff disputed. The plaintiff claimed that the sale was actually made at Rs 15,000 which was earlier directed to deposit Rs 3,000 in advance, considering the sale of Rs 5,000, which was considered to be Rs 15,000. And 26,666 / 67, 1 / 3rd of the 80,000 defendants, on the request of the defendants that the plaintiff had deposited less money, both the trial court and the appellate court dismissed the claim on the basis that the plaintiff. Did not comply with the provisions of Section 24 (1) of the Northwest Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act of 1987. As alleged by the shopkeepers / defendants allegedly 80,000, the plaintiff claimed that the deal was levied at Rs 15,000, the provisions of section 28 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Act. , 1987, was to play. At the time of the final verdict, the trial court's main duty to determine the market value of the suit property was when the sale price dispute arose, when the sale price dispute arose between the plaintiffs. Could not be considered worse. Clearly mentioning the specific amount to be deposited by the Pratt Importer at the time provided for in accordance with Section 24 (1) of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987. In the present case, errors in the 1 / 3rd of the sale deposit should be considered in addition to the court office as well as the court office even otherwise the plaintiff / pre-importer erred due to the error.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
