Section 9 Evidence Testimony The benefit of the doubt took place on the main road during the day, a busy road that always suffered heavy traffic, but no one was involved in the recovery process, nor the trial. It was produced during the trial by motorcyclists, but the motorcycle was not presented to the court during the trial, nor was it exhibited, in connection with the prosecution's story building. There was a direct nexus, which allegedly told about the recovery of five kilograms of prohibited cash from a carriage cave. Y Wisdom was not appealed, and it was also incredible that sending the late Sample to the Franzic Science Laboratory was another important aspect of the prosecutor's story, and he also plunged into the mystery, with the alleged artifact remaining four days. The fact of the matter is that the person who took the sample to the laboratory, the prosecutor did not prove from the record record but was full of contradictions which made the prosecution's case doubtful and if one arises in connection with the prosecution's story. So the benefit of the prosecution and the sentence filed by the trial court against the accused was set aside. And he was acquitted of the charge and released
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
