Find a Lawyer

GULDARAZ KHAN versus STATE

The accused accused of defining Section 9 (c) evidence did not choose to fight the appeal and requested a reduction in the sentence awarded by the trial court. The accused was neither a criminal nor a drug smuggler nor involved in the case before when it is alleged that he is an eighteen year old student, considering his offer. It is necessary that the case of the accused can be considered mild in the circumstances and the amount of punishment can be reduced as well while his punishment was reduced to one while maintaining the conviction. The year's RI period has already passed, but the sentence of retribution was upheld

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009

• AKHTAR ALI v. State 2009 PCrLJ 50
• SADEED-UR-REHMAN v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2009 PLD 54
• DIN MUHAMMAD v. ABDUR RASHID 2009 PLD 59
• NAWAB KHAN v. UMAR ALI KHAN 2009 PLD 61
• Sayed HAMID SHAH v. ADNAN KHAN 2009 CLC 65
• MUHAMMAD HANIF v. MUHAMMAD YOUNUS 2009 PLD 65
• DARWAISH v. State 2009 MLD 65
• Mian BAHADUR JAN v. State 2009 PLD 70

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2009 →

pakistani advocates Umer Kot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes