HAJI MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN versus S.D.O./A.M.O., PESCO, SUB-DIVISION TIMERGARA, DISTRICT DIR LOWER
Sections 42, 54 and 55 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R25, Sections 151 and 115, sued the appellate court for a declaration, prohibition and mandatory injunction, so as to remand the case. Be that user Electricity, receiving money as arrears against him, was unfounded; against facts, against the law and against the rules and regulations, so prohibiting the plaintiff from applying for a prohibition / mandatory injunction also That the arrears should be banned from disconnecting the power supply in the plaintiff's premises, the plaintiffs also prayed for the recovery of Rs. 1,50,000 as damages against the defendants. The trial court had just passed an order deciding that the plaintiff was responsible for the assessment. At 15 kW and he said that he should be charged a rate and he would be obliged to pay the arrears to the trial court, however, dismissed the case for damages of Rs 1. Trial for trial on trial after granting the opportunity to present evidence from the parties, accepting the appeal filed by the defendant against the trial court's decision, 50,000 Remanded to the court, the plaintiff had ordered an appellate court under which the case was justified. That the claimant would be liable to pay at the rate of 15 kW or 19 kW, it was involved in litigation between the parties, which is related to the record, but no record was presented to confirm and clarify this question. Was not done An effective decision cannot be accepted between the parties, appellant said
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
