Sections 52, 78, 81, 83 and 103 (A) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 225 and 1993 Constitutional pleading to the counting of votes, allegations of use of force, repression and pressuring the presiding officer to the applicant. Officials said they should count the votes, calling for the release. The applicant alleged that the respondents used force and coercion and pressed the presiding officer to favor him and as a result the voters were not allowed to exercise their right to vote at various polling stations. ? That the lady voters were not allowed to cast their ballots and that there was widespread fraud in connection with allegations of electoral justification filed by the applicant, these were questions which related to the facts dispute and hence A recording of the evidence will be required, which may not work. The High Court set up extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction in the electoral tribunal for adjudication of electoral disputes, in which case it had a special jurisdiction and in this case an alternative to resolving the realism dispute and resolving its earlier grievances. Proper and effective treatment was available. The Election Tribunal, he could not question the election wires nor dispute the elections in the extraordinary constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
