A. XXXVII, the order to provide security to the appellant by the High Court for the collection of R 2 suit money is Rs. Shows the price. About 40 40,00,000 Nazir of the High Court also submitted a report to the court stating that the value of the property under trial is from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 32,00,000 which the High Court directed. Was That the property offered cannot be accepted as security as its value is less than Rs 40,000,000 and as a result the appellant was instructed to pay 40,00,000 within a month. Provide fresh security in the amount of rupees, it was incomprehensible how when the title documents in relation to the property were admitted to the value of the money more than the court order, how could the court be convinced? Given that such a guarantee cannot be accepted, the ION certificate presented by the appellant may represent an exaggerated price, but the fact is That Nazir himself had discovered more property than the money offered as security, after which there was no reason to review this first order approved by the High Court. Neither was assigned nor was it shown on which basis a figure of Rs 40,00,000 reached the Supreme Court, allowed an appeal, set aside the rejected order and directed that the security presented before the High Court be referred to the Supreme Court. To be accepted, however, it was observed that the High Court had to spend sufficient time and expense for the Supreme Court to avoid litigation by the parties and to seek justice.
