Find a Lawyer

ALI AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

A XXVI Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Review of the Supreme Court's decision It is of its nature that there was no appeal or repetition of its nature that one party or the other dissatisfied with the judgment of the court itself. Thought to be. Identifying an error or omission on the face of the record

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• SAHIB DAD v. PROVINCE OF PUNJAB 2009 SCMR 385
• ANWAR-UL-HAQ v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2009 PLD 388
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR 2009 SCMR 390
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights, Islamabad 2009 PLD 393
• WAPDA v. Qari MUHAMMAD FEROZE 2009 SCMR 396
• S.M. SOHAIL v. Mst. SITARA KABIR-UD-DIN 2009 PLD 397
• JAVED PAREKH v. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR MALIK 2009 CLD 398
• AHMED NAWAZ v. State 2009 SCMR 399

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

how to become a advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes