SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW, JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, ISLAMABAD
Article 184 (3) of the Constitutional petition under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution before the Supreme Court convictions of the applicants was that the High Court judges declared their position illegally after the declaration of emergency on November 3, 2007. Was instructed to remain on. It was properly affirmed by the seven-member bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Taka Iqbal Muhammad Khan vs. General Pervez Musharraf PLD 2008 SC 178, that the judges were not sworn in under the Interim Constitution Order 2007. Keeping office; he said the decision was in view of the decision of the 12-member bench in the case of Zulfiqar Ali Shah vs. Pervez Musharraf, chief executive of PLD 2000 SC869. It was put in vague terms that after the verdict was announced, there was no judge. The Superior Court may be removed by following the procedure laid down in Article 209 of the Constitution. In the case of Taka Iqbal Muhammad Khan, the decision in the tire case of Zafar Ali Shah was not properly reviewed, therefore, the decision of the 12 judges will prevail. It states that the aforesaid judges were re-nominated for a period of one year according to the 268 2008 notice, which was, in fact, their original appointment as they were given seniority status on November 2, 2007, and Later on the notification, the date of his appointment as Additional Judge of the High Court on 15-9 2008 was extended by six months, after which his current term expired, therefore, an extension of six months. Formerly the appointment period will be extended as Judges, whose term is to be dated 25 8 2009 and for all intents and purposes, he will be Additional Judge till 25 2010 2010. To continue our services
