Find a Lawyer

CHAUDHRY KHAN versus MAJOR KHAN ALAM

Sections 4 and 30 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 10 of the Transfer of Property Act (I82 of I82), section 54 pre-discrimination trial limitation process and registered under section 54, of the Property Transfer Act, 1882 Period will be calculated from the date of registration of the sale agreement because the physical possession of the suit property under the sale could not have been made before then if it had been made under the contract of sale under the previous contract. It will not sue any of the previous ownership. It is not correct to calculate the length of time from the date of sale agreement, ignoring the date of sale contract entry on this basis.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• WAPDA v. Qari MUHAMMAD FEROZE 2009 SCMR 396
• S.M. SOHAIL v. Mst. SITARA KABIR-UD-DIN 2009 PLD 397
• JAVED PAREKH v. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR MALIK 2009 CLD 398
• AHMED NAWAZ v. State 2009 SCMR 399
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE PROGRESSIVE PAPER LIMITED/ CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL PRESS TRUST, ISLAMABAD v. JAMIL-UR-REHMAN 2009 PLC(CS) 401
• Dr MUHAMMAD SAFDAR v. EDWARD HENRY LOUIS 2009 PLD 404
• Ch. FAQIR MUHAMMAD v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE 2009 SCMR 405
• ECHO WEST INTERNATIONAL (Pvt.) LTD. LAHORE v. GOVENRMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary 2009 PLD 406

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

pakistani advocates Bhimbar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes