Section 302 (b) Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 188 Review of Supreme Court decision New fact The accused defendant's minor age and his father faced a trial where the accused was sentenced to trial. Was sentenced to death and sentenced to death. The court, while her father was acquitted and the conviction imposed on the accused by the trial court, was upheld by the high court, as well as the Supreme Court raised by the court that at the time of the incident, Was under the age of 18 and proceeded under the influence of his father, which could not be brought to the court of fact, even though he had been objected to by the prosecution. He has been subjected to some kind of assault at such a pending stage in his conduct but in the interest of justice and to find out if any of these materials Weiwas is present, the Supreme Court considered the merit record request that the accused was serving in the army at the time of the commission. The crime, therefore, is a plea that he was a minor, because a minor could not serve in the military, the statement of the accused under section 342, CCP, showed that he was thirty years of age and It also states that he was one. Therefore, army personnel, according to the record, his age at the time of the incident was stated to be about 28 28 years. Also, in his statement under section 222 CR PC, The suspect denied the suggestion that he had murdered his father on provocation, which the co-accused accused of. Take a Summerstyle and set up a new defense case and at the request of this pending
