CH. FAQIR MUHAMMAD versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Article 8 (3) and (5) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3), with the former effect, the vacancies of the scope of the vacancy were vacated in the year 2004 and pending inquiry against the public servants and the negative comments and punishments therein. because. They were not considered for such vacancies in the service record. In the year 2005, section 8 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act of 1974 was amended, and in the year 2007, 2007, when any government employee had already retired, no development or pro-pharma promotion could be approved. ? Impact of service If a public servant's request is approved that he has the right to development in 2004, it would be equivalent to that this amendment to section 8 of the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 was completely ineffective and thus Despite the amendments, promotions can be promoted. Specializing in prejudice and it was not intended to be a positive, specific and explicit legislation, the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the decision passed by the service tribunal. The request filed by a government employee was refused
