MUHAMMAD PANJAL versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION RANIPUR, KHAIRPUR
Section 22A, 22B & 154 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request for Criminal Case Registration / Applicants tried to lodge FIR against the respondents / proposed accused, but the relevant police station, Section H Refused to do so. Section 22A & 22B, Application for Justice under CRPC, which sought report from Section HO and concluded on the basis of such report that there was no incident of robbery by the accused. Yes, the request was deleted. / The proposed indictment was that the petition against the order of the session judge by revision or application under section 6161 AA, CRPC, if any, was considered invalid. If the appropriate forum had been summoned by referring to the wrong provisions of the law, it would not have prevented the forum from giving relief, if a case was presented, it would be lawful to show that it was for the applicant's lawyer. The lawyer was correct that if a report was made of an outward identification. The offense, then under Section 154, concerned the police officers of the PC was obliged to take action in accordance with the said section and make a proper inquiry. If it turns out that the complaint is false, the complainant may be prosecuted as such. Under Section HO, the relevant police station was directed to take appropriate legal action on the applicant's complaint in accordance with Section 154, CCPC, and if he failed to do so within a specified period of 7 days. The HA will reject anyone. Furthermore, even after a strict scrutiny of the law, it was found that there was no merit in the complaint filed by the applicant.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
