Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN KARACHI versus BACHANI SUGAR MILLS LTD.

O XXI, R 83 (3) The objection to the sale of the entire asset executed by the decree was objected to by the lender on the basis that the entire property (mill) ordered to be sold was four times The amount of money deposited by the applicant is higher than the entire sale was postponed because the sale of only a portion of the assets would be sufficient to cover the entire figure amount, to meet the partial sales non-declaration amount. It will be sufficient for the High Court to accept the plea raised by the judgment and it is directed that the plant and machinery of the mills as well as other In connection with the assets that are running, a separate bid must be issued for some plant and machinery items mentioned in the notice of the court. The creditor of the judgment had to be invited as well, in the event of a reduction in the extent to which the decision-maker failed to meet the deficiency, only then the fresh order of issuance of the contract would constitute the sale decision for the land and the building of the judgment debtor. Should

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• IMTIAZ AHMED CHEEMA v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION DHARKI, GHOTKI 2 2010 YLR 189
• BASHIR DAWOOD v. Haji SULEMAN GOAWALA & SONS LTD. 2010 CLC 191
• Dr. MUHAMMAD JUNAID v. KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2010 MLD 192
• AAQIB BUILDERS through Proprietor v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Nazim 2010 YLR 192
• AFTAB HUSSAIN v. KARACHI PORT TRUST through Board of Trustees 2010 YLR 195
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2010 PCrLJ 198
• KHURRUM GHANI v. State 2010 PLD 200
• MUHAMMAD PANJAL v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION RANIPUR, KHAIRPUR 2010 YLR 201

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

advocate for immigration from Mustang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes