Sections 497, 499 and 513 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/420/468/471/109 Fraudulent, Use of Fake Documents as Fake Documents, Approval and Scope of Guaranteed Amount While the special court, while approving the bail, the co-accused had set bail of Rs 5 lakh, the bail amount was fixed for the accused. The purpose of guaranteeing accuracy was to ensure that the accused would appear in court when needed, but could never be used to defeat him. On the bail granted by the court, if the amount of bail is fixed at the time of paying the bail, which the accused cannot present, it will be the amount of denial of bail, with the approval of the bail. Transferring the accused from prison to jail would mean that he was acquitted of the charge and did not mean that he would have to stand trial before setting aside the amount of bail for such a case. Should not be In the present case, the concept of granting bail was ignored by a special court. When setting a bail amount of Rs.5 million for the accused, which was irrelevant to the amount of bail given to the former co-accused, the guarantee of the bail was not only based on the role of the accused in the crime, but on other factors. Also At the same time, in the present case, bail was granted on the merits, but the maximum amount of bail was determined by ignoring the surrounding factors, including determining the amount of bail for the accused. Such a difference cannot meet the end of justice. his
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
