Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus STATE

Testimony of Section 9C9C Evidence Police officers failed to associate themselves with the area's freelance with the search operation, violating the mandatory provisions of Section 103 despite information from the detective, CCPC prosecution records said The defendant did not prove that the accused was arrested with a counterfeit currency note and that he knew the basic requirement of Section 489C, PPC to be a counterfeit currency, therefore, was not met by the prosecution. There was no crime in possessing fake currency notes, knowing that they were intended to be used only with fake currency notes, not the necessary court mind to bring a home charge against the accused at the trial. The case was decided based on the decision and not on the evidence presented on the record.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Dr. MUHAMMAD JUNAID v. KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2010 MLD 192
• AAQIB BUILDERS through Proprietor v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through Nazim 2010 YLR 192
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN KARACHI v. BACHANI SUGAR MILLS LTD. 2010 PLD 193
• AFTAB HUSSAIN v. KARACHI PORT TRUST through Board of Trustees 2010 YLR 195
• KHURRUM GHANI v. State 2010 PLD 200
• MUHAMMAD PANJAL v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION RANIPUR, KHAIRPUR 2010 YLR 201
• MOULA BUX v. State 2010 PLD 204
• CONTROLLER (NOW DIRECTOR), KARACHI v. NADEEM ENTERPRISES through Proprietor 2010 YLR 205

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Arifwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes