MUHAMMAD DURAB YOUSAF QURESHI AL-HASHMI versus MST. MUNAWAR SULTANA
Article 5 and Schedule of the Constitution (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, reliance on the recovery of documents related to the objections on the objection of the plaintiff due to the amount of Rs 700,000 on the recovery or cost of the articles. The educated family, who was financially sound and had considerable financial resources, added that the plaintiff asserted that in addition to the articles of dowry, the plaintiff was given a car on which he Has given the plaintiff Rs 700,000 which he has left. And that is why his defendants misused it that there is no reliable evidence on record, other than a transfer letter, regarding the car to indicate that he actually gave it a car. In the trial, the trial court ordered a sum of Rs one lakh in the plaintiff's case. On the appeals filed by both the parties, 350,000 appellate courts did not object to the same valid documents presented by the plaintiff. The justification for relying on the documents that the oral testimony presented by the plaintiff was the subject of a lengthy investigation; Also did not get under way to shake the credibility of witnesses, courts were given the opportunity to reach this conclusion. There may be exaggerations in calculating the value claimed by the plaintiff, but at the same time, they made a conscious effort to reach a realistic person based on the facts and circumstances of the case, and the evidence on record The court refused to intervene. Constitutional jurisdiction Constitutional application dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
