LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus HASSAN ASSOCIATES THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER
Sections 42, 21 and 56 (f) of the Arbitration Act (X of 1940), section 20 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLX XX, RR1 and 2 of the suit prohibited a permanent injunction to restrain the plaintiff's statement. Filed a lawsuit for the announcement and grant. In addition to terminating the original arbitration agreement as a result of the additional agreement, the plaintiff also applied for a temporary injunction which was granted by the trial court by the Appellate Court ordering the trial court to restrain the trial court from breaching the contract. Had given. Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, states that arbitration proceedings are pending to ensure prompt completion of a validity agreement cannot be specifically enforced because the rights of the plaintiffs can be measured on special terms. Further, this agreement was based on the professional competence of the plaintiffs and it was momentarily and numerous details which no court could oversee, granting the discrimination grant to Section 56 (f) of the Special Relief Act 1877 The source was blocked. In connection with those agreements that could not be specifically enforced, the appellate court argued for itself the powers that were not included in it, issuing the injunction directing the court against this order and filed an appeal under section 20 of the Arbitration Act. Was gone 1940, was not delayed in such courts, therefore, not only was it illegal, but it was also dismissed by the High Court without any jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010
