Find a Lawyer

RANA SAEED AHMED versus NASIR AHMAD

Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioners challenged the trial court's decision in the complaint under the Unlawful Settlement Act, 2005 that the applicants were the owners of the disputed property but the defendants Who were allies with each other. During the constitutional plea hearing, it came to the notice of the parties that if the unanimous order passed by the trial court was set aside, the Act would have prevented the applicants from acquiring them by filing a joint complaint under the Consensus Act. And it will uphold the interests of justice. Remanding the trial court to re-adjourn the case and re-adjudicate the case was affirmed after giving the applicants an opportunity to proceed with their case, in strange circumstances the consensus among the parties promotes the elimination of justice. Was in the interest of giving. High Court permits constitutional petition and sets aside head

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2010

• RIYASAT ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 795
• MUHAMMAD SOHANRA v. State 2010 YLR 796
• ABDUL RASHEED v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, MIAN CHANNU 2010 CLC 797
• LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE LTD. through Managing Director v. HASSAN ASSOCIATES through Managing Partner 2010 MLD 800
• MUHAMMAD SALEEM AKHTAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 803
• MUHAMMAD DURAB YOUSAF QURESHI AL-HASHMI v. Mst. MUNAWAR SULTANA 2010 CLC 803
• AKHTAR ZAMAN KHAN v. State 2010 YLR 804
• SARDAR KHAN v. SADIQ alias MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2010 MLD 805

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes